šŸˆ 2025/26 Football Offseason Recruiting and Transfers

By sapping the resources from every other program.

Did you not see the Poverty Program theme with their baseball turf fail last week?

4 Likes

Get rid of turf period!!! I’d imagine Tech will be bankrupt or disband programs with the current football spending

2 Likes

they are literally involved with a ton of big time prospects, there class is 2 in the conference. We are at the bottom again

1 Like

A class is not just made of HS kids

VT will burn everything to be good at football given they believe in their guy. Football has and always will be their engine, when they’re good at something else it’s just a fling to forget about a bad football year. Not saying it’s good or bad, just clear priorities in Blacksburg

4 Likes

It’s a version of Clemson in that regard. If football is weak, the whole school suffers financially and emotionally.

1 Like

Which is funny, because over the last decade have they been much better than us in football?

2 Likes

They’ve pushed all their chips into the center on FB (really had no other choice unless they wanted all sports to be mid). Will see what kind of hand they have in 2-3 years

3 Likes

Yeah I’m not exactly surprised nor concerned about what they’re doing. Franklin has always been a recruiter and nothing makes a desperate fanbase feel good about themselves than seeing their team ranked highly in recruiting class rankings. I honestly think some staffs recruit specifically to the rankings because it’s basically job security because that’s what fans care about (maybe even more than winning). Overspending on HS kids right out of the gate is a great way to extend the honeymoon period, especially when your current roster isn’t all that great and you’re not going to actually win games on the field immediately.

The question will be can they actually either develop and/or retain the guys they are signing. We won’t know that for a few years.

5 Likes

Yeah all of these guys will presumably want raises if they hit, and if you’re spending all your money on youth and only win 6-8 games when the fanbase is expecting a lot more… you might struggle to fundraise to give these guys raises when you’re ready to really compete.

6 posts were merged into an existing topic: :basketball: 2026 ACC Basketball Off-Season

I would like to have the problem of having a highly recruited incoming high school class. Or at least have our high school recruiting not suck.

10 Likes

I care more about our ability to get players who help us win on the field. I think we have been doing that through a combination of the portal and HS recruiting. I don’t care about our HS recruiting class rankings (for many reasons). So much of that is driven by class size. Our class sizes have been intentionally small so we’re never going to have a top 25 class, even if we do land everyone we want to.

4 Likes

How much of our budget are you willing to give to those high schoolers, especially knowing most of them you’ll have to pay two years for minimal production because the bulk won’t really contribute until their third year? And how will you feel about the high percentage of those well -paid recruits that are busts or get hurt or transfer out before ever getting a return on those first couple years of investment?

Obviously it matters, but businesses have to make business decisions. And the staff deciding the Portal, guys you’ll get a Year 1 contribution from, is the better value use of dollars is a defensible position.

2 Likes

I mean, there’s lots of middle ground here. I didn’t say I want us to splash out massive cash for a top recruiting class and forgo the portal. I said I’d like for our high school recruiting to not be abysmal. I think there’s plenty of room for our high school recruiting to be better without it meaningfully impacting our approach to the portal. Low four stars and high three stars aren’t commanding massive money as freshmen.

For 2027 our class is ranked 14th in the ACC, but as noted by @EmbracePaceUVA, that accounts for class size. If you look at average recruit grade, we’re ranked… also 14th. We don’t have a single 4 star. Our 2026 class was overall dead last in the conference, and by recruit grade was… also dead last.

I’m not saying we should be top 5 in conference or something. Go with the portal strategy if we think it’s a more efficient way for us to win. But I think there’s still a lot of room for improvement just to be mediocre.

7 Likes

Definitely annoyed Elliot didn’t make room for Fontel Mines. Bringing him home during VTs coaching change should’ve been a top priority.

11 Likes

Yeah this is the issue with Elliott’s recruiting to me. If you’re going for a small class, you should be pursuing quality. We’re getting cannon fodder.

Your margin for error building through the portal every year is just very small and getting contributors from high school is how you make it wider.

4 Likes

I just don’t put a ton of stock into HS football recruit rankings. I think they are very accurate and predictive for the top 300-400 players or so (and most of the data used by people supporting the correlation between ratings and wins is skewed towards the top 25 programs) but beyond that, you are never going to convince me that the 575th ranked 3 star recruit is necessarily materially better than the 900th ranked kid.

There are just way too many damn players to effectively scout and evaluate. This isn’t basketball where scouts can spend 3 weekends at the right AAU events and see literally the 150 best prospects play head to head for multiple games. We’ve seen how many examples of kids getting a rating AFTER they’ve made a commitment (aka the paid scouts literally never saw the kid and are just watching tape for the first time).

The majority of the kids we have been signing have had strong offer lists, good tape, and solid physical attributes. I’m not going to fret because some guy at 247 who may have never seen them play in person says they might be a slightly weaker 3 star than some other guys. Not saying the rankings are irrelevant, I just don’t think they’re as relevant for the non-football factories recruiting mostly 3 stars who aren’t evaluated as seriously.

3 Likes

I don’t think it’s incorrect to say we’ve gotten probably better than expected return from the classes we’ve signed if you’re just going by their high school ratings.

Getting highly rated high school kids is nice - winning is nicer. I’m just not that convinced 1 is a pre requisite for 2 like it used to be.

1 Like

I do think it’s notable that the highest ranked recruit of Elliott’s tenure has been our best player in Kam. Don’t think that’s a coincidence. I’d personally like more Kam’s!

13 Likes