!
I recall folks thought it was fun when Mike Curtis earned his and could go by Dr. This is a dumb thing to get twitterpated about and a dumber thing to be inconsistently twitterpated about.
!
I recall folks thought it was fun when Mike Curtis earned his and could go by Dr. This is a dumb thing to get twitterpated about and a dumber thing to be inconsistently twitterpated about.
Iāve made this point so many times in this thread. We field more sports than SEC schools and our scholarships cost way more each than for SEC schools. We also receive way less TV money and sell fewer tickets. Weāre much more reliant on personal donations than SEC schools.
Also, when sports were on scholarship limits instead of roster limits, you could much more easily justify a non-rev sport on a straight P&L basis. In FY24 the baseball program had 2.7 mil revenue and 6.1 mil expenses, but the team was limited to 10.1 scholarships, so 785k in student aid expenses. There were 37 guys on the 2024 roster, so 27 were paying full freight minus financial aid, 12 in state. Tuition and fees is about 20k in state and 60k out of state, making a wild guess that financial aid grants covered half of it, thatās 12 guys who pay 10k and 15 guys paying 30k, which is 600k (could be up to 1.2 mil) in tuition revenue directly attributable to baseball.
Now that the top baseball programs have 34 scholarships or 25 plus 5% on rev share (about 1 mil), the rosterās not bringing in 600k-1.2 mil tuition revenue and scholarship expenses have increased by about 1.8-2 mil, thatās a 3 mil net additional cost.
This is going to be the case for every sport and I wouldnāt be surprised if we need to drop 5-10 teams. The SEC doesnāt sponsor menās soccer or wrestling, menās or womenās lacrosse or field hockey. Even with our good history in some of those sports, theyād be easy to justify dropping in a conference move.
True, but I donāt recall him ever being referred to as āDr. Curtis.ā
Point is itās not a diss to call her Carla. Itās born of familiarity, indicating sheās āone of ours.ā Like Oak and Tony and Bronco and Odom and Elliott (who would probably be āTonyā if we didnāt already have one).
We really need to cut sports. People care about losing BOC and sucking at baseball, relative to how much people care about wrestling, rowing, field hockey, etc. Unfortunately itās now too late and we have totally start over as a baseball program but itās time to trim the fat and become more lean like the SEC
2.5 million Americans have PhDs, and millions more could if they wanted. There are more PhDs than lawyers in this country, uh, I mean juris
doctors. Only a low achiever would think itās āa ridiculously hard thing to get.ā
You are the one that needs to learn about the school, junior. The thing that sticks out about you calling her Dr., in addition to coming off as a total fanboy, is that there is a long-held tradition at the school not to refer to people as Dr., since Jefferson never was one. Stupid and pretentious, like āfirst yearā or āgroundsā or āThe University,ā sure, but still a thing and makes your posts emphasizing her doctorate as some sort of unique honor that trumps all else, even more ludicrous.
I canāt remember anyone insisting on referring to someone associated with UVa athletics as Dr. The closest thing was calling Robert Anae, āDr. Bobā and it was done derisively.
Beat you to it again @DFresh11
Glad Iām not sick
Then weāre fine by those standards too. You get to add the revenue from a very large market DC and a bunch of solid secondary markets.
I think we will be included in the next round of SEC/BIG expansion if it happens. Iām weirdly not worried about it. I think weāre just too attractive due to our location/institutional qualities. But the ACC needs to actually finally die so we can get out. Right now weāre just withering on the vine.
The fact that we sponsor so many additional sports is why Iād prefer the BIG as a landing spot. That plus the academic fit. I get the pure sports fandom perspective of wanting to be in the SEC, and Iād be fine with it, but I lean BIG.
Regardless, cutting a few sports is likely useful unless they can completely self-fund on donations. Wrestling obviously, maybe rowing. Would have said volleyball but somebody pointed out one of our big donors is a volleyball alum so that may not be wise. Would have also said golf before the run to the finals. Can cross country be knocked off while keeping track and field or are they like the same thing? I have no idea. Anyway. Some trimming around the edges probably wouldnāt hurt.
Technically lawyers are doctors!
Iām interested in the āif it happensā part. For the past 20 years expansions were inevitable, but now I wonder if weāre capped out. Prior expansions were done either to keep up or get ahead of other conferences; but the SEC and BIG have no threats now, they are secure at the top. Adding more schools is just dividing up the pie.
If it does happen I think itāll be as part of an NCAA breakaway, and driven by TV producers designing the next big thing.
Well letās hope thereās one more round. If things truly stagnate in their current form we are in some major trouble.
Correct, and there are fewer of them than there are PhDs in this country, and very few think being a lawyer is a unique accomplishment.
Agreed. The only real selling point we offer to new TV deals is markets (or the required partner to UNC), which is quickly aging as a paradigm as streaming grows as a mix of total. If we can get Football and Basketball to be nationally relevant again (again ā results on the field), then we have a more durable case for inclusion.
Carla Williams. Fundraising but coaches gone?
Her role in OConner saga
So itās kinda strange. Up until the 60s, most US law schools awarded LLB (bachelor of laws) degrees first, then LLMs (masters in law) and SJDs(doctorate in juridical science). Then most schools switched from the LLB to the JD(juris doctor), but kept the LLM and the SJD.
Absolute no one refers to a JD as Dr. Iāve never met an SJD, so I donāt know if theyāre even called Dr.
But I mean, the only people who get offended by these Dr. titles are MDs, some of whom also get offended by DOs, DDSs, PharmDs and ODs using Dr., and I canāt give fewer craps about this topic.
Iām feeling like we should let Baseball have their thread back so folks can actually talk about baseball there.
Perhaps this thread could be used to discuss such topics as:
Thanks @jazznutUVA
I would have gone with ādonāt knowā if that were an option, so figured I should default to not laying blame.
On the one hand, it feels like a fumble. After 20+ years we should have a āhometown biasā with Oak. On the other hand, the $ gap (not to mention competition level) thatās developed between ACC and SEC is so huge that maybe it just couldnāt be overcome no matter what.
Itāll happen again because at some point, the powers that be at the BIG10 and the SEC are going to wonder what exactly do schools like Northwestern, Rutgers, Mississippi State, and Vanderbilt bring to the table in terms of eyeballs and athletic prowess. Arenāt there other schools out there that can bring a more compelling profile? When the tv contracts run up in 2029 and 2030, conference realignment is going to happen again.
Iām with you here, but I donāt know why. VA and NC are the obvious major states where neither conference has a presence, but would want one given their growth and affluence.
If you think about it, athletics has always served as the front porch of a university. Something to welcome in the community and visitors with the hope that some of those people decide to attend the school. The states of VA and NC have lots of people schools in other states would love to attend their schools. You bring your football team in, locals learn about your school and maybe they apply. Or maybe if they canāt get into the local school, theyāll decide to go to the SEC or B1G equivalent.
So I think the conferences would like to acquire the flagship schools of every state if possible. The ones where kids who apply but donāt get in would be academic assets to any other conference school.
Plus, the SEC doesnāt want to go to 9 conference games because they think itās too hard. They need a break so us being a bad football program isnāt the negative some think it is. We just need to get to respectable.
This is why I think either conference would prefer us over VT.
Also, I was the one who brought up Amy Griffin being a volleyball alum. Otherwise, I could see VB on the chopping block.
But even if we keep all the sports and join the B1G, weād get the B1G TV and bowl money, but weāll never sell 100k seats to football games, so weāll always be behind the big boys in ticket revenue. Would need to trim just so weāre not spread too thin.
Oh and the next round of realignment will occur around 2030. The ACC putting dollar figures on costs to leave the conference at the same time the other conferencesā TV contracts are up almost assures that.