Or before going on a date…
1 Like
Let me spell it out for you: Laughing out loud.
It would take a final 4 caliber team to come through with that record.
Good. I feel better now.
“Ain’t that right Gunny?”
I got the reference. Love that movie.
3 Likes
You sir are a gentleman and a scholar. Great scene.
Mr. Rate: That’s how conspiracy works. Them boys on the grassy knoll, they were dead within three hours. Buried in the damn desert. Unmarked graves out past Terlingua.
Nick Memphis: And you know this for a fact?
Mr. Rate: Still got the shovel.
1 Like
Whole team out celebrating Reece’s 21st. Love to see it.
9 Likes
Oh boy! Ha
2 Likes
12 Likes
Skillz!!
Fwiw, I refreshed my memory of the quads, and looked at the non-con. And it is indeed, currently on Torvik, all Quad 1-A and Quad 4.
1-A is H:1-15, N: 1-25, A: 1-40. (4 total)
4 is H: 161+ (6 total)
Though, where I was wrong, is that while the number of 1-A games is high, the distribution isn’t so far off, at least from last year (Iowa and providence finished much better than they looked at the time).
2022: 3 quad 1-A, 1 quad 3, 6 quad 4
2021 (odd year): 1 quad 1A, 2 quad 3, 3 quad 4
4 Likes
18 Likes
I think Rothstein needs to hear from Fresh and LRA
6 Likes
He needs to field questions from us - our in to hear who is being red shirted
1 Like
Does the committee even look at “1-A” as separate from “Quad 1”? I’ve been thinking that 1-A was a (valuable) invention of KenPom and Torvik and others, and that it isn’t officially used, but I could be wrong.
At least at the top of the bracket they do. Probably not as much for the bubble because most of those teams don’t have Q1A wins.
Lol I’m confused. Is this real?
It’s split out separately on the team sheets the committee sees. Who knows if they look at it much?
3 Likes
No it’s not
2 Likes
Yeah, 1-A isn’t a real thing. It’s just a split on the team sheets.
You can see our team sheet from last year here. It’s the split in Quad 1:
1 Like