🏀 Virginia vs Northeastern, Friday, 6 November 2026, 1700, ACCN

Plus, even if you consider Eli one of our top 5 players, which might be true, that doesn’t necessarily make him a starter. I thought Jacari was one of our 5 best players last year, and he thrived in his microwave role off the bench, same for Chance. That dynamic can work really well, and I think Eli could be that this year.

3 Likes

Still getting through the full game, but my major takeaway so far is … Louis Bond! If his jumper stays consistent, I think he’ll be playing at a high major next year.

8 Likes

Top 4 averaging 66ppg. May not last at that level, but that is a very high floor for any game we play this year especially as the rotation tightens.

still think the complaints here are first world problems. We have one of the better starting units in the country. The offense (and defensive pressure) will be able to flip games with 10-0 spurts. That consistent attacking pressure will wear teams down.

Excited for Sunday, should be a good one!

7 Likes

My two cents:

  1. Sam had Chance’s game from Drexel - just never really got into a finishing flow, tried to push too much. Still results in 8-8 FTs when the refs did the inevitable and started with calls on Northeastern. Why we can’t get him open looks from 3 is a bit beyond my pay grade.
  2. TDR is just aggressive and he is still learning to contain it and channel it. He looks very comfortable and confident in his 3-point shot and some of the moves at the rim will start to fall. He should be shooting 6-8 FTs minimum per game. I thought it was a stretch for him to be pre-season ACC POY, but it’s certainly not looking that way so far - he has improved so much on top of everything he brought to the table last year.
  3. Chance with the bounce back- still the straw stirring a bit too fast but really like his confidence
  4. Not seeing what others see in Anya - the offensive hit is a lot when he’s out there
  5. Nolan is still learning his role out there - I think he follows Sm’s path from last year when he was passive and then grew as the season progressed.
  6. Like Dixon - a lot.
  7. X improved most in my mind from game 1 to game 2 of anyone on the team. Under control today and though a small sample size, he’s looking like he’s made the Justin Anderson leap from outside
  8. Grünloh is good - I don’t see “weak” hands - I see a lot of bad or ill-advised lobs to him
  9. Still baffled by CRO’s combinations, but I’m putting it down to wanting to just let guys play while keeping Sunday’s game in mind
  10. The game looked closer than it actually was - not the same kind of anaconda-like strangling of other teams that we got with CTB’s teams, but we just methodically kept building the lead.
  11. Northeastern is a good team - there are three guys on that team that can play high major. The 34 point spread was a joke to start with and yes, we all should have collectively bought aggressive futures against the spread in the “prediction markets”

Looking forward to tomorrow - to see what the team has learned so far (and I disagree with whoever said we shouldn’t have 3 games in less than a week’s time - these guys are young, in shape and the more playing now, the better they will be for Sunday’s game - I don’t think Arkansas learned a lot in their game, but Cal is Cal and he can coach).

10 Likes

I’m with ya on Kalu. Put in Barksdale for Anya’s minutes—I think Silas has more potential and is as good as Anya right now. Also I think Barksdale is hiding a lot of his offseason muscle gains underneath his T-shirt and a lot of people would be surprised at how yoked he actually is.

1 Like

What does “usage” measure/ tell us? I am terrible at these things

2 Likes

Basically how much you are doing stuff with the ball on offense. It’s calculated based on how many shots, turnovers, and free throws you have relative to how many the team has during your minutes.

1 Like

So sorta touches on how much you have the ball in your hands kinda thing?

Of course I am biased toward watching X when he is in. And I think he is that spark kinda guy who does more with relatively less touches. But could be wrong in the “watching your kid play” syndrome hahah

4 Likes

i think bond and the other guy (king?) were as responsible for the close game in the beginning as our poor play. But even as bond came out hot in the second half we were pulling away.

looking at the box score king and bond were a combined 17 of 30 (57%) and some of those shots were well contested. they shoot a little worse and its a complete blowout.

2 Likes

I like the in game commentary. But I think it’s fair to be frustrated that a lot of the in game posts seem to be tied to a bigger point the poster wants to make about our offseason strategy, our ability to win in March, etc etc. (Which have all been heard!). I’d rather talk about the game in the game thread - good bad or whatever- but that’s just me.

People can post what they want to post at the end of the day. Ignore function still works.

5 Likes

NE as a whole was 12-15 from the midrange thanks to them:

https://barttorvik.com/shotchart.php?year=2027&muid=NortheasternVirginia11-6

Just gotta tip the cap sometimes.

5 Likes

Totally agree about the part about using little sequences in game to validate bigger narratives. Way too soon for that.

2 Likes

We can validate all opinions one way or the other after tomorrows game tho right??

2 Likes

Should be said you can effect the game in ways other than offensive usage

Real adjusted plus minus per hoop explorer right now (absurdly small sample size obviously lol and the usual caveats about on/off based stats being sometimes misleading)

De Ridder +11.6
Lewis +10.4
Adekunle +6.9
GrĂźnloh +6.8
Gertrude +5.6
Mallory +2.0
Dixon +1.9
Carrere -0.1
Vide -0.4
Anya -4.2

2 Likes

I’ve always thought of usage as “who ended the play?” So who shot or turned it over or drew the FT basically.

It’s not necessarily who had the ball in their hands the longest.

And 20% is the baseline, sorta (100% divided by 5 players).

3 Likes

Thanking you sir. Makes sense and is terribly flawed in ways. But I like the idea.

Kinda like are all fumbles bad? Or just the ones you lose

1 Like

sure, but “affecting the game in other ways” still usually includes a double digit usage rate. to put it in perspective - Jack Salt’s career low usage for a season was 11.1.

Who was doing the game last night? PBP/Color? I don’t even know how to look that up anymore

A: Color was Dennis Scott. Said his son played against Chance in HS

1 Like

My thoughts after two games:

  1. core four looks as good as advertised. Maybe not the exact allocation of stats we might’ve predicted but the overall carrying the team is there. Only slight concern is the lack of disruption at the rim (two games is a small sample size)

  2. Elijah gives us 5 reliable contributors

  3. Dixon sure looks like he’s going to be a 6th, even if the overall impact is a bit mixed so far (to be fair janky minutes so hard to get in a flow). 2nd half stretch against Drexel the most promising bench run from anyone through two games

  4. Need more impact from Adekunle and Anya. Give them a little grace given their adjustment but if we are only going to have 8 consistent rotation players all 8 of them need to add value

  5. No one else has separated to make it a 9 or 10 man ration thus far. I suspect Arkansas will be a big audition for Vide as we will want ball handling against their pressure

5 Likes

Not vs Arkansas or Maryland but next mid major we play I would love to see Barksdale get a shot. I’m not too super high on him but he is taller, known as a rebounder in aau, and has a developing 3pt shot.

6 Likes