They should get in based on resume, wonât deny that.
But after watching them (and their underlying predictive metrics), they are unlikely to perform well. Watching them against a bad team extinguished some of the charm.
First Four seems like the right spot for them assuming they canât get a 12 seed.
Haney, my degrees are in math. I understand objective truth. It seems opinions are not permitted with supposedly full proof stayistics, however.
I understand there are some stats that are good, and some that arenât. If the committee deems them worthy, then great for them. I think they would have gotten the auto bid, so itâs moot. But I do think they will lose in the first round. Maybe Iâm wrong, but they will get the chance.
For all the sickos out there, Wagner-Long Island on ESPN+ right now is for the first bid to the NCAA Tournament. The winner of the other semifinal is ineligible.
23-23 at the half. Both teams shooting 30% from the field and 10% from three. This is March, or something like that.
32/64 teams will lose in the first round. The question is whether they deserve to get in.
Youâre allowed to have opinions. But when you have ones like that, and you post them on a message board, thereâs always a risk people might disagree (I know this from personal experience).
I donât care if people disagree with my opinions; if I did I would lurk and keep them to myself. I donât like it, however, when I am angrily attacked for having an opinion.
Queens had this ASUN championship locked up and then completely and totally botched the final minute. They were up 7 with 42 seconds to go. My god. Now going to OT.
Horrible possession from Maryland to essentially seal the deal. Saunders passed up a great look from three that would have preserved the two for one. Buzz calls a timeout so they can run a garbage out of bounds play that clanks off the rim