šŸ€ Virginia vs Tennessee @ Nassau, Bahamas, L, 64-42, 3-1 (0-0 ACC), Thursday, 21 November 2024, 2130, CBS

I think offensive boards are the big concern at this point. They’ve struggled with that in all three games.


Even more concerning when you look at Sanchez’s time at Charlotte. It’s the one area his teams have always struggled. I’m wondering if he overemphasizes getting back on D.

6 Likes

Tony was not big on ORs so it was never a strength, but Ron’s numbers are even more stark than Tony’s

3 Likes

Yeah I’m worried about offensive rebounding as well, especially if we’re gonna be a more perimeter oriented offense. It’s more anecdotal but long shots should = long rebounds, and thus more chances for us to get OR’s.

1 Like

I think if you want to over interpret 3 games of data, and I’m not opposed to it, then lack of 2s and easy buckets is a thing. Basically reflects our strength being 3-point shooting and weakness being dribble drive and easy post buckets. (Relatively speaking)

1 Like

Just spot-checking some charts on Torvik’s site, teams that shoot more 3s tend to get less offensive rebounds. This makes sense, because the lineups that make for lots of 3PA are probably not well-suited on average to grab boards.

5 Likes

That’s a good point.

Would be interesting to see a chart of average shot distance from teams compared to offensive rebounding rate, and whether there would be a correlation. Probably not, think I’m conflating teams like Bama and BYU who excelled at both last year as being the ā€˜norm’.

1 Like

I think we score way more than 42. Can Igor really guard Saunders? I’m not seeing Igor has anything but an average defender and above average offensive player… way over hype. Saunders goes for 20.

Would be very happy with a cover so long as it’s not a late back door cover where we are thoroughly out classed from the start

1 Like

Hyperbole is common place these days. I see it constantly in the threads on this site, saying that certain teams are horrible, suck, really bad, a joke, etc. when, in fact, ā€œaverageā€ would be a more appropriate description.

1 Like

Gut says Tennessee by 10-12 which lines up with that, though it’s tricky in a game that’s very likely only gonna be 66 or 67 possessions. Could benefit us.

3 Likes

Completely agree.

With that being said fuck Tennessee they’re trash and we’re gonna beat them by 40.

11 Likes

True dat. No BS’n there at all! Bitches goin down!

I would never ever bet on uva to win or to cover because that would be stupid. But that line is not right. We are going to lose by 40.

3 Likes

Are you calling my overuse of hyperbole mid?

5 Likes

This is quite possibly the stupidest thing anyone has ever said in the history of language

6 Likes

Beating a 10.5 spread means either we actually played competitive and stayed within striking distance… or our green team closed the gap a bit at the end… neither of which seems likely.

Or… Ron keeps our starters in against their scrubs… :thinking:

1 Like

Everyone raves about UConn because they won two nattys in a row, but what I say is they were just a half standard deviation above average. (Don’t check my math)

1 Like

I can’t remember the last time our green team didn’t piss down their leg. Except for Grant Kersey of course.

2 Likes

line already creeping up. Tenn -11.5

Beating that spread isn’t likely? Barttorvik projects a 69-61 Tennessee victory. Don’t pay for kenpom but their general numbers aren’t too far off from Torvik so I wouldn’t expect a ton of variation in score prediction.