šŸ€ 2025-26 In-Season Outside ACC/UVa Thread

Texas Tech is whooping Iowa St at their place. No Toppin no problem?

2 Likes

I find Iowa state to be a bit overrated. Would love to face them in the tourney

2 Likes

Onyenso on Blake and TDR on Jefferson. That’s a yes from me dawg

3 Likes

Texas tech winning this is terrible for our seeding

2 Likes

Kansas ran into a buzzsaw similar to us, and we don’t have a Darryn Peterson.

The top teams this season, in particular, are just on another level. That’s why I don’t think we should get down on ourselves. Our team is really good. Learn from it, move on, and return to taking care of business.

11 Likes

Kansas also beat them 2 weeks ago at home (without Peat but still). But further validates the power of the top teams at home, vs catching them on the road/neutral.

1 Like

We kinda dug our own grave with the non-con schedule, and then Maryland being a non-factor and Ohio State/Texas being bubble rather than top 25 made it so it was going to be tough to climb even as high as we have

1 Like

https://x.com/kerrancejames/status/2027900489304531439?s=46

5 Likes

At least we weren’t Gonzaga today. We got drilled by the best team in CBB. Gonzaga getting worked at St. Mary’s.

4 Likes

Wow Ohio State about to take out Purdue, making that win look that much better for us.

10 Likes

https://x.com/mattnorlander/status/2028245278743052557?s=46&t=wAzMZR-0PRGT1LpN6U5x0g

That dude is going to have one of the wildest wikipedias for a college basketball player that never sniffed the NBA.

Was he involved in the fight on the team plane last year I forget

2 Likes

I think so (but maybe I’ve just assumed it)

He was the guy that people cited would age out of his parents’ health insurance during the season.

2 Likes

Miami (OH) AD is dragging Bruce Pearl’s ass online. You love to see it.

7 Likes

I think anyone, other than Bruce Pearl apparently, would agree that Miami OH gets in as an at large with an undefeated regular season and any loss in the MAC tourney.

But what if they lose one of the next two? Two of the next two?

3 Likes

For me, I’d say lose two of two and it’s more questionable. Right now their WAB is like 26th**. If they lose two, it might be more like 35-40, or 40+.

Win one feels almost like a lock, but conference tourneys (theirs and others) might matter…

Edit - 35-40 is probably too low. Those teams are a full point below them, and I guess it’s unlikely as many as ten teams would get a full point? But I don’t have much experience eyeballing this…

** per Torvik. See post below for official

2 Likes

(Uh oh, dreaded triple reply time …)

@AdventiveQuasar I really do think a resume like this is one good reason to have a committee. Even if you find a way to aggregate the various metrics, it’s not a resume that’s easily reducible to a number…

Understanding that there’s a problem is the first step toward recovery. :rofl:

iggy azalea netflix GIF

3 Likes

In this new world where P5 ā€˜s cherry pick low- and mid-major talent every year, maybe those guys get compensation through scheduling. If you take one of their players, you owe them a game. But then Miami (OH) kept all their players so they’d get hosed anyway. Isn’t there a way we can blame this on their conference? Like maybe they should get a few byes in their tournament and a 20-point lead to start the championship game?

1 Like