Over/Under.
1 Like
Tough one. I say close, but under
4 Likes
Over.
2 Likes
Under
3 Likes
If he goes over, heās definitely a first rounder.
6 Likes
Think this is one where I hope itās under? Unless Reece can do it much more efficiently than heās shown thus far in his career. Most likely if Reece has to score that much it means the McKneely/Rohde/Gertrude trio isnāt scoring as much as we need to be a dangerous March team
4 Likes
11 or 12 ppg
4 Likes
A good bit under. Probably gonna be around 12ppg
4 Likes
Yes. But I am an ACC fan. I love the conference.
7 Likes
Under. Reeceās value is as a distupter and facilitator.
4 Likes
Definitely under, but heās capable of that and moreā¦he just wonāt need to. Agree with about 12, and leads the ACC in assists.
3 Likes
Thats what I think. So we call it 11.5
3 Likes
Better question. Over under - 12
4 Likes
11.5 is a great number with good action.
Iāll take the over
2 Likes
Under. No way Reece scores 1/3 of our points this year.
12 Likes
I read this thread too early this AM. I spent the first handful of responses trying to understand why Reeceā¼ļø was going to play less than 15mpg - I thought there was some injury or something I missed. The realization that Iām not an intellectual giant has actually put my Friday on a better path!
10 Likes
I love Reece, but Iād hammer that under
13, 8, 5 with All ACC defense
9 Likes
5 steals or 5 rebounds?
6 Likes
8 assists per game in our system would be bonkers
3 Likes