The second chart tells a good story: the goals came from relatively difficult scoring chances in the first half, but from 60 mins onward, they started to crack Bolivia open but weren’t able to finish off a chance. And then the last chart with the shot map shows that Bolivia just couldn’t make inroads into the 18-yard box.
VAR is not allowed for just a foul… just to check goals, penalty kick calls and red card decisions.
A lot include fouls… but none of the reasons are because of fouls. That’s it.
American football and basketball are the same. You can’t use VAR for just a foul or no foul decision. I’m not sure how you can complain about soccer and not basketball and American football as well.
Not sure what’s the right way to evaluate the Panama game. 70 mins is a long time to play a man-down, I’ve read some stuff before that ballparks the value of an early red card as approaching 1 goal in a specific game.
Very unfortunate that the biggest (missed) chance directly preceded their second goal:
Also that’s the second time in 3 competitive windows one of our guys has gotten a straight red completely outside the flow of play. That lack of discipline ultimately falls on the manager/coach of a team
I mean, ultimately, I think playing Uruguay in a pressure situation is a decent proxy for a World Cup-level match, so it’s going to be a fair measuring stick. I just wouldn’t know what to do in the scenario where they play them to a draw that’s relatively equal in terms of chances created…in a vacuum that’s a solid performance but it also might get them sent home in the specific situation they are in now.
Helpful for us that Carrasquilla took that brain-dead red card late in the match, he’s one of Panama’s best players. It’s gonna be white-knuckle time for sure though.