I’m a throwback/retro uniform lover. Give me uniforms like these with our colors. One white with navy/orange trim and lettering, one navy with white/orange trim and lettering, and then an alternate orange one with navy/white trim and lettering that’s worn maybe once a year.
Feels simple to me.
And maybe make the cardinal just a throwback cavalier or UVA logo.
Wasn’t part of the issue CTB? My understanding is he had substantial input on what he wanted the team’s look to be. Otherwise I’m guessing Nike would have put out something a bit snazzier.
I could couldn’t care less about the uniforms, as they are. As long as there is a set of white unis and a set of navy (or orange) unis, I’m happy. To me, they are such a minor detail, and they shouldn’t be a distraction for anyone.
I don’t think he got into the weeds but the way the design process typically works is that the designer asks for some initial guidelines and then presents a few different options from which the decision makers choose. I thought it was stated or implied that the lack of orange and overall plainness of the jerseys were partly because that’s what CTB preferred. To be clear, CTB is not responsible for Nike giving UVA virtually the same font as Tech.
All fan bases want to complain about something. If it is something so trivial as the team’s uniforms that generates the angst for UVa fans, then the program must be in pretty good shape. These are the good ol’ days!
Exactly! There is nothing wrong with *discussing different jersey options. There are just some people on this site that love to come out to complain about the complainers all of the time even though it’s the offseason and there are only a few topics to discuss otherwise.