🏆 NCAA March Madness 2024

It’s kinda nice knowing that we can’t make this list:

#1 “upset” pick is UNM over Clemson; I think UNM is a slight favorite in the matchup in most predictive systems.

I think they did a better job of explaining their model this year (avoid if you don’t want to be reminded of the Furman game):

5 Likes

Utah state will be an interesting barometer for how good the MWC is. They won the reg season but have little else on their resume. Most brackets had them as a 6 or 7, ended up as an 8. TCU favored by 2.5 over them, which is in line with kenpom

https://x.com/mattnorlander/status/1769726019068440865?s=46&t=wAzMZR-0PRGT1LpN6U5x0g

2 Likes

When was the last time we played a lower-seeded team (meaning lower number) ? Gotta beat CSU to get there….

Also, I remember playing CSU at Scott on a swampy Thursday evening about 20-25 years ago

1 Like

2011-12, lost to Florida in the first round.

Edit: just looked up the seeding vs T-Rank ratings that year, and wow was seeding a mess.

3 Likes

I was living in Colorado at the time, and worked with quite a few CSU grads. Not fun.

It was also after that game that I was permanently banned from having a nerf ball in the house. On the play we lost in the last minute, I launched it across the living room and accidentally busted the glass exterior of our fireplace. Wife was not happy.

2 Likes

Agree with the first sentence, vehemently disagree with the second.

I want Reece :bangbang: to go out on a blaze of glory. I want to thrash Texas. I have no ill will towards Kadin, but I want him to foul out in this game with 0 points and four face mauls.

Go Hoos!!

14 Likes

Your reaction was entirely reasonable. So was hers.

3 Likes

Kadin must’ve been talking a lot of shit to get a reaction like this, and he doesn’t look thrilled to back it up. Very on brand, too soft, not a dawg.

13 Likes

These guys annoy me every year. Not because their model is wrong, but because they hype up their “proprietary Slingshot model” and then it pretty much just spits out what we already know. They ask “Excluding the 8-9 and 7-10 games, where are the most likely upsets?” And then every year the answer is “All the 6-11 games and all the 5-12 games.” Well, duh.

(To their credit, they also included one 3-14 game this year, Akron-Creighton.)

And their percentages for those games tend to be roughly in line with KenPom and Torvik. Which again, they’re not wrong! But they need to sort results by where they demonstrate incremental value. (Like: “Here’s a few games where the efficiency models are missing something.” That would be worthwhile. And maybe they’ve identified a few such games! But they’re not showing it like that.)

6 Likes

https://x.com/bfawkes22/status/1769744102395089065?s=46&t=y0pD4dAiibd6gpo_tXLkaQ

5 Likes

Agreed. I think incremental value over existing efficiency models is the right way to look at it. I’ve always understood these models as identifying games that have higher variance to the potential outcomes (or is it variability? I get those confused). Also, these models should be able to predict regular season upsets too, no? I’d love to see data on that.

3 Likes

That slingshot model is garbage. I can’t figure out why the Athletic keeps running it back.

Akron-Creighton is one where they could claim incrementality. Chance of upset: KenPom 13%, Torvik 10%, Slingshot 20%. But regardless of who wins that game (and the other 9), we’re not going to get enough data to evaluate whether Slingshot is adding or subtracting value. (We’d have to go back to the Furman brainiacs to try to figure that out statistically.) Seeing this applied to the regular season is a good proposal.

2 Likes

Dante made it though

https://twitter.com/TheHoopHerald/status/1769562512809181318

3 Likes

Mr. HoopVision trying to provide hope* for the Haney family

*a setup for an even more embarrassing outcome

3 Likes

Yeah, that was an interesting part of the selection show, just in terms of how far things have come. Someone asked if anything about the seeding surprised people, and they were all like “Basically no”, once you allow for the committee having to move teams around a little on seed-lines for various reasons. They even made a point of noting how much better seeding has gotten in recent years compared to the travesties that used to be semi-common a decade ago.

2 Likes

Need guys like Beekman to be aware that Shedrick is going to be hunting cool blocked shots. Bait him and draw fouls. (If we win tomorrow)

2 Likes

Vegas vs. the analytics.

That’s interesting. KenPom thinks we’re a 2 point underdog.

1 Like