(trying not to annoy anyone who hates RS discussions, so I will put this here)
My issue with it is – and not that I necessarily need to hear this in a presser – is that I don’t hear the other side. He’s bringing up the PT and the obvious issue that it’s hard to find time for 12-13 guys. Yup, of course. But it still leaves open the obvious follow-up question: okay, so why is 0 MPG a better option than ~5 MPG during a few of the cupcakes? And the only answer that I think makes sense is if you see a tradeoff in that 5th year. And, w/r/t the 5th year, my view is that none of us are particularly good at predicting the future and 5 years is a long way away.
I actually think PT is sort of a bad reason for giving the RS; I think necessary physical or hoops development to be able to play one’s position in college is a good reason, but I don’t see that case for anyone on our team. Everyone on this team, from what I can see, seems to be ready to make contributions at the ACC level.