Donāt like thisā¦.
But better now than next year
Donāt like thisā¦.
But better now than next year
Had an ankle procedure that was already planned according to Tony last night on his radio show. Planned it so that he would be ready for post season workouts
The man deserves respectā¦itās Wyatt!
I think this is a pretty distorted representation of the discourse on this subject. Seems to me that the anti-current uni/alt uni camp appears more aggrieved (and undeniably more prolific).
mire interesting to me is that this topic seems to get rehashed whenever we lack more meaningful stuff to complain aboutā¦so maybe itās a good thing when the topic raises its head again.
For my own part, the current uniforms are fine. Do they distinguish our brand? Not really. Do the old ones (mid-2010s versions) do a better job? I suppose so, but I never thought they were any great shakes either. This is the point @73CAV is probably making; win and you always look good.
Now for the part where I talk out of the other side of my face, the mid-90s unis look bomb as fuck to this day and Iām prepared to die on that hill.
So you DVRed the game tonight, havenāt watched it yet, and arenāt hip to the whole sky is falling world is over we are back on the bubble thing I guess?
(Spoiler alert)
Where does the sky even begin? Can a sky fall to a location where it already is? And why isnāt elijah gertrude playing?
You got me. Havenāt watched yet, but was aware of outcome. Iām slowly learning the benefits of avoiding game threads after tip-off.
Trilly has some legsā¦ that account only lasted about a month or so.
It did immediately miss after all. Tough start.
41st in NET this morning. So @Raleigh_Hoo what do we need to do over this last 6 to feel good heading into the ACCT? 3-3 likely good enough as long as one of the losses isnāt GT?
I need to go back over my bracket again. Must beat GT for sure. I think 2 of the other 5 will likely have us in without too much to sweat, although the caveat is always who those two are and how the rest of the bubble plays out. We also cant afford too many more double digit losses. For instance if WF comes in and beats us by 20+ that changes things.
I think coaches either are ignorant of the margin of victory element of this or just dont care and prefer to be gentlemanly. But beating teams by 10 vs 20 is absolutely a huge deal in this era. I get getting some time for those that dont play much, but that IMO should be the last minute or two.
I have no way to prove this but if we would have lost by say 2/3 points last night instead of 11, I bet our NET is a few spots better.
Bartās tool has us 7th out if we beat GT and lose the rest. If we beat GT and any other team (besides Duke) weāre in the first 4. If we beat GT and Duke, 10 seed. If we win only the games weāre currently favored (Wake, @BC and GT), 11 seed.
Very firmly on the bubble this year.
If Pitt wins the rest of its games except for @Wake and @Clemson, theyāre firmly on the bubble and could give the ACC 6 teams assuming Wake makes it too.
19 posts were merged into an existing topic: All Things TuGard
Eamonn todayā¦
More diagnosis than prescription, Iād say. Which is fine, heās not our coach! Links to the ShotQuality standings, which are interesting:
https://shotquality.com/team-standings
However, it is also kinda confusing, as Iām not sure if the standings are ranking purely on shot quality or if they are incorporating other stuff as well. Because Houston has a super low ārim and 3sā rate (a little lower than ours actually), and their adjusted offensive shot quality is rated at #5. I donāt see how that can be true unless the standings are really just adjusted efficiency ratings that incorporate the full four factors (shooting, rebounding, turnovers, free throws).
Looks like an average of offensive and defensive shot quality (a little counterintuitive)
Our guys just canāt get open to shoot more 3s.