Last year Texas A&M clearly did enough with their conference tournament performance to get a bid and didn’t. Oklahoma could have made that same argument.
Conference tournament performance is unevenly evaluated year to year. Sometimes it means a lot sometimes very little. Recently it has been considered less.
For example Clemson would easily be a tournament team if not for injuries all year … PJ Hall was pulled from a game early in the year because he was still in a minute restriction and they lost their 8 point lead and the game in the last 4 minutes
I feel like I’m watching a Pentagon Press Conference every time the Kadin question is asked to CTB or JW, issue is danced around and we will never know
Question for the community - perhaps we should do a poll or new thread after the season. Tate/Titus did this a few years ago. Where is the Virginia Basketball brand now? I have to admit, this is one of the hardest things to understand on a national scale. I’m biased and we’re all in a bubble of course. Is Virginia basketball “rehabilitated” or etc. etc. Where are we as a program?
FWIW, if you just used regularized adjusted plus-minus from Hoop Explorer, filtering out the guys who haven’t played more than 50% of possessions, to fill out a ballot, it would be in order:
2nd team:
Ja’Von Franklin (GT)
RJ Davis (UNC)
Isaiah Wong (UM)
Kihei Clark (UVA)
Jordan Miller (UM)
All-Defense (warning - things about to get weird):
Ben Vander Plas (UVA)
Kyle Filipowski (DU)
Makai Ashton-Langford (BC)
Armaan Franklin (UVA)
Reece Beekman (UVA)
POY: Appleby
DPOY: Vander Plas
ROY: Filipowski
I don’t think that would be my ballot, but it’s kinda interesting.
If you wanted to more explicitly factor in total impact by weighting the plus-minus stat by number of possessions played, you get a slightly different list:
I think the advanced stats say Jarkel but eye test says Terquavion. My personal first team includes DJ Burns, too. I enjoyed watching his highlights leading up to our game.