It seems like the conference is devalued to a point that we need 6-7 wins including one at Duke or at home against UNC. Definitely need to avoid any bad losses and get these next two against Miami and at FSU (maybe that would be a bad loss now). Apparently the ACC is about on par with the A10.
1 Like
Which shows how stupid this all is, lol.
Thankfully it wonât matter when we beat UNC at home 
3 Likes
Blind resumes.
Team 1: Q1: 2-2 Q1/2: 5-4 Q3/4: 12-1
Team 2: Q1: 2-4 Q1/2: 5-5 Q3/4: 10-1
Answers: Team 1 is Virginia. Team 2 is Kentucky
19 Likes
I think we are team 1⌠wow interesting
1 Like
I saw your spoiler before you edited. this thread is ruined for me now.
4 Likes
My bad Serum
WowâŚjust wow.
1 Like
Yup, team 2 has a low-key thin resume. Below us in Strength of Record and Wins Above Bubble.
1 Like
Right, but I was responding to a comparison between us and Clemson. I donât think Clemson is on the bubbleâŚyet. Their only really awful result was losing to GT at home. We have a bunch of 20 point blowout losses which is killing our metrics.
No ACC team is making it without a winning ACC record, nonconference success and computer metrics love be damned. Right now Clemson is projected to finish 10-10.
2 Likes
If Clemson finishes 2-3 games behind us in the ACC, we beat them on the road, and they get in and we donâtâŚIâd be ok with a jump to the SEC or Big 10 by the end of this semester.
2 Likes
I was basing it on the current Bracket Matrix which had them as a 6 seed before yesterdayâs game. That makes me think if the season ended today, Clemson would be safely in.
@FSU is safely a quad 2 game.
The only truly bad loss opp left is home against GT.
2 Likes
Does the committee take into consideration whoâs hot and whoâs not or is it just based solely on your wins and losses?
And who you beat and who you lost to
They should if thereâs a lineup change ⌠and weâve had a significant one⌠but itâs usually only based on injuries
2 Likes
Since Jordan Minor entered the starting lineup:
6-1
+34 scoring differential (446-412 or 63.7-58.9)
FG% 43.8% (171-390)
FG% D 40.7% (146-359)
+9on the glass
+14 on the offensive glass
The previous seven games vs. high-major opponents (includes Memphis, aTm, and WVU):
4-3
-2 scoring differential (444-446 or 63.4-63.7)
FG% 44.0% (168-382)
FG% D 42.4% (158-373)
-26 on the glass
-10 on the offensive glass
Defense and rebounding have improved substantially.
11 Likes
Jake is now shooting 50% from three on the year (33-66). That ties him with Leon Bond (1-2 
) for best on the team.
McKneely shooting a paltry 47% (53-113). Smh.
10 Likes
Beautiful.
I think weâll see some cold spells from Groves soon. But what gives me hope is that we have enough weapons and weâre scoring more creatively so that it shouldnât hamper us too badly.
1 Like
No chance man. Groves will continue to shoot 75 percent from 3!!!
Man is he playing at a high level
3 Likes